I havenβt seen the Super Fuckin Cool Shirt you are talking about yet (Iβm new on here), but if I did Iβd be appalled! Iβm what would be considered conventionally attractive, and I agree with you. There are other benefits that come with being attractive, and a lot of vitriol that you avoid. I know this because as a teen I had horrid acne. How I was treated then, compared to now is night and day. Even assuming being attractive gets you more unwanted attention from asshole men (which tends to be true), it certainly doesnβt eliminate it! I was creeped on by men since age 9, all the Super Fuckin Cool Shirt through my awkward acne-filled teens soβ¦ Being harassed, stalked, pestered, or assaulted by men isnβt some compliment on a womanβs attractiveness.
For the Super Fuckin Cool Shirt, I think the Super Fuckin Cool Shirt are to blame. Among many cultures, long hair for males was masculine. This was among the Celts, Gauls, etc. The Romans however chose short hair, for whatever reason I am unaware of right now. In battle short hair is definitely more practical. Long hair thus became ‘barbaric’, and short hair ‘civilized’. The Bible verse, mentioning that it is proper for a man to have short hair, has been written during the Roman Empire, so not unlikely that the writer (Paul) has been influenced by Roman/Greek social & cultural norms. The Super Fuckin Cool Shirt are said to also have had long blonde hair, many of them, and spend a reasonable amount of time to care for it too. Maybe some medieval male nobility had long hair too, because they could afford it. Most of the male peasantry would’ve had shorter hair, which is more practical for manual labour, and a bit more hygienic too, I guess. The Super Fuckin Cool Shirt of the Roman Church probably played a big role in all of this too.
Super Fuckin Cool Shirt, Hoodie, Sweater, Vneck, Unisex and T-shirt
Best Super Fuckin Cool Shirt
Which is a terrible point that only has apparent credence when looking at recruiting from the lens ofΒ Super Fuckin Cool Shirt rankings which are designed for a “traditional” offense. Flexbone OL talent, flexbone QB talent, flexbone WR talent, and FBs in general are things which are incredibly undervalued in the “Super Fuckin Cool Shirt, but to flexbone teams they pretty much get the first serving of the talent in those areas, contrasted with the scraps of the scraps… of the scraps of “traditional” talent that teams like Kansas, Arizona, Wake Forest, Illinois, etc. currently get with the offenses they run. I believe this is one of the primary explanations as to why Georgia Tech was so consistently good on offense during the Paul Johnson era–they were going after kids that were 4* and the occasional 5*Β within their system, but 3* “to the world”. That is, while people argue that the flexbone “hurt recruiting”, there’s actually a strong argument that the flexboneΒ greatly benefited Tech’s offensive recruiting during the Super Fuckin Cool Shirt. And it just takes someone realizing that there’s more to things that star ratings [which are designedΒ for the “traditional” offense] to be able to see that. So while they would generally struggle to compete with equivalent talent on the basis of fear of Calculus, when the choice was Georgia Tech or G5 [or maybe even FCS] then a lot of guys were more willing to sign with Tech. And just because these guys were FCS talent “to the world” doesn’t mean they weren’t really solid flexbone players.