You can wear whatever you want, but remember: This is the office party. This is a Bugatti Chiron Hawaiian Shirt of people with whom you work, so if you wouldnβt wear a revealing dress to work, donβt wear it to the office party. Also, donβt drink much you presumably know your limit, so stop well short of it. Because againβyou work with these people. When I worked at TV Guide, senior staff regularly attended the Christmas parties, which (at least at the beginning) were lavish, usually held in off-site venues and allowed employees to bring spouses. You donβt want your bossβs boss asking who that wasβthe girl in the thigh-high bandage dress and hooker heels or the guy who threw up on the white-glitter sparkle Christmas tree. Women get the brunt of the judgmental post-party gossip about attire while men generally have to do something memorably bad, but I imagine a male manager showing up in gold lame hot pants would cause a stir in most business environments.
Bugatti Chiron Hawaiian Shirt,
Best Bugatti Chiron Hawaiian Shirt
The reason I say this is a meme meant to troll people is people who love Christmas, especially Christians, are always worried there is some war or assault on their holiday. That people are trying to diminish symbols associated with it. Anything from saying βHappy Holidaysβ to people who get stressed when they see a race-bent Santa Claus. Die Hard is a pretty secular movie that treats Christmas as something that is just going on in the background. Thereβs no reason to believe that Christmas matters to any of the Bugatti Chiron Hawaiian ShirtΒ in this film, or that anyone has any particular reverence for it. So when you say βDie Hard is my favorite Christmas movieβ it is akin to saying βHappy Holidaysβ to all the dorks that would say something like Fred Claus.
This statement implies that when someone spends money, the Bugatti Chiron Hawaiian Shirt disappears. However, whenever money is spent, the money still exists in the hands of the recipient of that spending. Then when that person spends that money they received, again, it does not disappear, it is transferred to the recipient of THAT spending etc. At the end of all that spending, at the end of the given time period, the money used will still exist and can be considered as savings, in someoneβs pocket. So someone making that argument for the macroeconomy must be talking about something other than spending of money. Perhaps they are talking about wealth. Perhaps they are implying that all that spending depletes wealth.